Easier to read with cream paper, a tint, more contrast or larger text? Choose your colours and text, once, for every page.

Preview

DI 3.7; NC 3.7; DS 3.8; CS 3.12: Compare sources side by side

This is the first page of the lesson. Read it and have a go at the activities. The rest is in the full lesson.

65 minutes

Three answers, one decision

You must pick a cable standard for a new office. A maker's page says one thing. A textbook says another. A colleague says a third.

You cannot trust all three. You need a fair way to compare them.

Key words

WordWhat it means
Comparelook at two or more things and note how they are the same and different
Reliableyou can trust it to be right
Validit is right for your question and your system
Biasan unfair lean towards one side
Credibilityhow believable the author or publisher is
Currencyhow up to date the source is
Publisherthe person or group that put the source out
Scorea number that sums up how well something does

The cells students fill in are left blank in this preview.

By the end of this lesson

Note

I can compare sources against the reliability and validity factors and see which does best.

Starter

Have a go

Starter

3 questions
Have a go: your answers are marked here and then forgotten. Sign in if you would like your score kept, and to pick up where you left off.Sign in to keep your score

Your answers are marked here and are not kept. A college account keeps every student’s marks.

Worked example: three sources for a cable choice

FactorMaker's pageTextbookColleague
Credibility of publisherMaker, an expert, but sellsNamed authors, a publisherTen years of fitting cables
CurrencyThis yearFour years oldLast month
Evidence and citationsTest results shownLists its sourcesTold from memory
BiasSome: it sells the cableLittleNone
Fit for this jobRight productGeneral, not this productSame size of office
Score out of 5 good signs433

The cells students fill in are left blank in this preview.

Reading the comparison

The maker's page scores highest, but it has some bias. So you use it for facts, and a second source to check it.

The textbook is solid but dated. The colleague is current and has no stake, but has no written proof. Compare the outcomes, then decide.

Try it: score one source

Code: python
source = {"author_named": True, "cited": False, "year": 2025, "sells": True}
score = 0
if source["author_named"]:
    score = score + 1
if source["cited"]:
    score = score + 1
if source["year"] >= 2023:
    score = score + 1
if not source["sells"]:
    score = score + 1
print("score:", score)

# Set cited to True. What is the score now?

The lesson goes on

4 more parts of this lesson are in the full curriculum, with the tasks, the final check and the labs. A college account gives your students all of it.